Ready to submit an abstract?
You have to be logged in to submit an abstract.
or
You have to be logged in to submit an abstract.
orPlease make sure you have read the instructions below first.

*** CAUTION, please read the following instructions BEFORE submitting your abstract ***
There is NO limit on how many abstracts a co-author can be listed on.
If you encounter any issue with the submission process, please first read the instructions below and check the step-by-step manual [here]. If the issue persists, contact the ECS webeditors.
The ECS strongly believes that all marine mammal research should strive to minimise its impact on animals. Some studies are more intrusive or invasive than others. Any potential impacts should have been weighed against the likely conservation benefits. Therefore, the ECS expects that work reported in conferences uses best practices, adheres to relevant national legislation, and is conducted under permits and licenses where required. For more information about best practices, please read the Guideline for Treatment of Marine Mammals from the Society of Marine Mammalogy endorsed by the ECS Science Advisory Committee (SAC).
Each author of an abstract submitted must have contributed significantly to the research and assume responsibility for the abstract's content.
Every abstract should contain the following components:
Not all abstracts will follow a traditional scientific structure. Abstracts addressing management, policy, ethics, education, historical analyses, or conceptual/theoretical topics will be evaluated on their clarity, originality, and contribution to understanding or improving marine mammal science, conservation and welfare. The abstract should present a coherent argument supported by appropriate evidence or reasoning, even if it does not include a hypothesis, research methods, or quantitative results.
Abstracts considered to be presenting future or on-going projects without presenting any results, or describing what will be carried out may not be accepted.
There is NO hierarchy between posters and oral presentations. All abstracts will be subject to anonymous review and selected on merit. The type of presentation is not considered a reflection of the quality and/or value of the research. However, some types of research and results are better communicated by a poster presentation while others by an oral presentation. The conference aims to present research in the most appropriate way to the maximum number of people.
Each submitted abstract will be peer-reviewed and scored by a minimum of two independent reviewers with expertise in the specific subject area. The abstract review process will be conducted double-blind, i.e. all authors’ names will be removed before the abstract is reviewed.
Each abstract will be reviewed on 1) Scientific Rigour and Reproducibility [application of the scientific method providing a robust and unbiased approach in the design, analysis, reporting, and interpretation of results], 2) Importance/Significance [importance of the research in terms of advancing the field of marine mammal science, or the conservation and management of marine mammals], 3) Originality/Innovation [new findings or new approaches vs. updates, modifications to older findings, or routine applications of well-established research methods]. Please take this into consideration when writing your abstract.
Abstracts rated with poor Scientific Rigour and Reproducibility may be rejected.
Reviewers might flag abstracts for which they have best practice concerns (more info here), and these will be reviewed by the SAC. If you believe that providing more detail may help the reviewer in deciding whether to flag your abstract to the SAC, please use the designated text box during abstract submission.
All abstracts need to be submitted via the “Submit an abstract” button at the top of this page. This will open a form that includes the following sections.
If you have not completed all required sections you will not be able to submit the abstract. Please check that your abstract follows the “Best Practices for Abstract Submission” and "Review process" above before starting the submission.
Please provide the authors’ names, surnames and affiliations. Multiple first names must be separated by a space. Add authors sequentially from first to last author.
Abstract title: Provide the title of the presentation. Do not capitalise the title and refrain from using special characters. The maximum number of characters is 180, otherwise the title will be truncated.
Abstract text: Enter the abstract text as one continuous paragraph. Do not include title, authors, or affiliations. Do not indent the first line of the paragraph.
The word limit for the abstract text is 300 words. As the abstract is typed or pasted, a word count box will show the number of words. If your abstract has more than 300 words, the system will block the submission.
Topic: You will need to identify a main topic for your abstract submission. Each topic is accompanied by a brief description to help you decide which is most relevant for your submission. There are 9 major topics from which to choose, and ‘Other’ should you feel it does not fall within the bounds of the other nine. Topics are not all mutually exclusive, so please submit your abstract under that topic which you feel best suits your research. You will also have the option to choose a secondary topic. Here are the topics:
Keywords: You will need to select some keywords relevant to your abstract to help assign reviewers. You will be able to select keywords from the following list:
Presentation type: Here you will select your preferred presentation type (poster, short or long talk).
The author can indicate their preferred presentation type. However, the Scientific Committee can consider that another format is most appropriate. The available options are:
Language support for non-native English speakers: We now have a language support system for non-native English speakers!
If English is not your first language and you would like assistance during the Q&A session to feel more confident presenting your work orally, please indicate this at abstract submission. If your work is chosen for an oral presentation, we will contact you to provide assistance. We will then pair you with a fellow speaker of your native language who is also fluent in English to support you during the Q&A (e.g. ensuring you understand the questions or help formulating your answer).
If you need more information, please contact our language support coordinator here: language.support@europeancetaceansociety.eu
Once all sections have been filled, you will need to PREVIEW your abstract, and then SUBMIT it for the submission to be effective.
If you are eligible for a student award (i.e. currently enrolled as a student, or have been enrolled within 12 months of the conference), you will be able to apply at Registration once your abstract has been reviewed and accepted. Applicants must have a valid student ID card which they will need to present at the conference. If the student is the first author, a supervisor will need to sign a declaration form stating that “I the undersigned, affirm that the work presented in this abstract is primarily that of the first (student) author” when registering at the conference.
Limited funds are available to provide grants towards travel/subsistence costs for students (and occasionally others). If you wish to be considered please select as appropriate. If you are earning a salary you are not eligible. The grants are intended for cases of genuine hardship. Please think carefully before applying for a grant.
Guidelines for Presenters will include indications for the poster dimensions and printing option as well as a 11:9 slide template for conference talks. They will be available later.
You have to be logged in to submit an abstract.
or